JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 16, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Nohora Gongora Mejia Vs. Joaquin Ramirez Martinez Como Presidente De La Empresa Comunitaria “la Esperanza”.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Guataqui-Cundinamarca Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca -Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria-. Ordena Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Guataqui, Cundinamarca, Para Que Tramite Y Decida El Amparo Constitucional Invocado.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevencion En Accion De Tutela
  • Estrado judicial escogido por el actor
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo del conflicto de competencia para garantizar sin dilaciones el acceso a la administración de justicia
Juez De Tutela
  • No le es dado variar apriorísticamente los destinatarios contra quienes debe dirigirse la acción
Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Competencia del juzgado Promiscuo municipal
8 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Guataqui, Cundinamarca, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por Nohora Gongora Mejia contra Joaquin Ramirez Martinez, presidente de la Empresa Comunitaria "La Esperanza".
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.